Skip to main content

Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA)

Implementing Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA) is crucial for ensuring the integrity and security of your software supply chain. This framework provides a structured approach to enhance security through defined levels, helping teams mitigate risks and maintain compliance during software migrations. By following actionable steps and leveraging appropriate tools, organizations can foster a more robust and trustworthy development environment.

Organization
OpenSSF
Published
Jun 17, 2021

Best Practice: Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA)

What This Best Practice Entails and Why It Matters

The Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA) is a framework designed to enhance the security and integrity of the software supply chain. Developed by the OpenSSF, SLSA provides a tiered approach that defines four levels of security controls to ensure that software artifacts are trustworthy and secure from development to deployment.

Importance of SLSA

  • Integrity Assurance: Ensures that software has not been tampered with during its lifecycle.
  • Enhanced Security: Addresses vulnerabilities in the software supply chain, protecting against threats that exploit weaknesses in dependencies.
  • Compliance and Standards: Helps organizations meet regulatory requirements and industry standards for software security.
  • Confidence in Deployment: Provides assurance to development teams and stakeholders that the software being used is secure and reliable.

Step-by-Step Implementation Guidance

Implementing SLSA involves several key steps:

  1. Understand the Levels: Familiarize your team with the four SLSA levels:

    • Level 1: Basic integrity checks, such as checksums for software artifacts.
    • Level 2: Provenance tracking, ensuring that artifacts are built from a specific source.
    • Level 3: Build and test automation, ensuring that all code is built and tested in a secure environment.
    • Level 4: Ensured software supply chain integrity, requiring strict controls and comprehensive policies.
  2. Assess Current Practices: Evaluate your current software development and deployment practices against SLSA levels to identify gaps.

  3. Create a Roadmap: Develop a clear plan to implement necessary changes, focusing on progressing through the SLSA levels incrementally.

  4. Integrate with DevSecOps: Incorporate SLSA principles into your DevSecOps pipeline, ensuring that security is a priority throughout the development lifecycle.

  5. Educate Your Team: Conduct training sessions to help your team understand the importance of supply-chain security and how to apply SLSA principles.

  6. Implement Tools: Adopt tools that facilitate compliance with SLSA, including CI/CD pipelines that support automated builds and testing.

  7. Monitor and Iterate: Continuously monitor the implementation and adjust your practices based on feedback and evolving security threats.

Common Mistakes Teams Make When Ignoring This Practice

Ignoring SLSA best practices can lead to significant pitfalls:

  • Underestimating Risks: Teams may not recognize the potential risks associated with insecure software supply chains.
  • Lack of Visibility: Without SLSA, teams may struggle to track the origins and integrity of software artifacts, making it difficult to identify vulnerabilities.
  • Compliance Failures: Organizations may face regulatory penalties if they fail to adhere to industry standards for software security.
  • Increased Vulnerability: Failing to implement integrity checks and provenance tracking can leave systems open to exploitation.

Tools and Techniques That Support This Practice

Several tools can assist in implementing SLSA:

  • Software Bill of Materials (SBOM): Tools like SPDX and CycloneDX help generate SBOMs, providing visibility into software components and their origins.
  • CI/CD Platforms: Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and GitLab CI can be configured to enforce SLSA principles during the build and deployment process.
  • Provenance Tools: Tools like in-toto and Grafeas can help ensure artifact provenance and compliance with SLSA levels.
  • Security Scanning Tools: Integrating static analysis and vulnerability scanning tools can help identify and remediate security issues early in the development process.

How This Practice Applies to Different Migration Types

SLSA practices are applicable across various migration types:

  • Cloud Migration: Ensure that all services and dependencies are sourced from trusted providers, and maintain integrity checks on cloud-based artifacts.
  • Database Migration: Track data provenance and implement integrity checks during data transfer to avoid corruption or loss.
  • SaaS Migration: Validate the security of third-party integrations and ensure that software components are up to SLSA standards.
  • Codebase Migration: Maintain strict controls on code integrity and automate testing to ensure that the migrated code meets security standards.

Checklist or Summary of Key Actions

  • Familiarize with SLSA levels and their significance.
  • Assess current practices against SLSA requirements.
  • Develop a roadmap for SLSA implementation.
  • Integrate SLSA into your DevSecOps practices.
  • Provide training for team members on supply-chain security.
  • Utilize tools like SBOMs and CI/CD platforms to support SLSA.
  • Continuously monitor and iterate on practices for improvement.

By following these best practices, you can significantly enhance the security and integrity of your software supply chain, ensuring a smoother and more reliable migration process.

Vibgrate CLI

See a real scan run

A replay of the actual CLI running against our test repositories — live progress, real findings, a genuine DriftScore. Nothing executes in your browser.

Replay
demo@vibgrate — bash
npx @vibgrate/cli scan
 
╭──────────────────────────────────────────╮
Vibgrate Drift Report
╰──────────────────────────────────────────╯
 
── node-turborepo (node) .
Runtime: >=18.0.0 (6 majors behind)
Frameworks:
Turbo: 1.13.4 → 2.10.8 (1 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Dependencies:
1 current 1 1-behind 3 2+ behind 1 unknown
 
── @repo/admin (node) apps/admin
Frameworks:
TanStack Query: 5.101.4 → 5.101.4 (current)
React: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
React DOM: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Vite: 5.4.21 → 8.2.1 (3 behind)
Dependencies:
3 current 9 1-behind 3 2+ behind 4 unknown
 
── @repo/api (node) apps/api
Frameworks:
Express: 4.22.2 → 5.2.1 (1 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Vitest: 1.6.1 → 4.1.10 (3 behind)
Dependencies:
7 current 5 1-behind 3 2+ behind 4 unknown
 
── @repo/web (node) apps/web
Frameworks:
Next.js: 14.2.35 → 16.3.0 (2 behind)
React: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
React DOM: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Dependencies:
2 current 6 1-behind 3 2+ behind 5 unknown
 
── @repo/config (node) packages/config
Frameworks:
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Dependencies:
2 current 2 1-behind 5 2+ behind 0 unknown
 
── @repo/database (node) packages/database
Frameworks:
Prisma: 5.22.0 → 7.9.1 (2 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Dependencies:
1 current 0 1-behind 3 2+ behind 1 unknown
 
── @repo/types (node) packages/types
Frameworks:
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Dependencies:
0 current 0 1-behind 1 2+ behind 1 unknown
 
── @repo/ui (node) packages/ui
Frameworks:
React: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
React: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
Dependencies:
1 current 4 1-behind 1 2+ behind 1 unknown
 
── @repo/utils (node) packages/utils
Frameworks:
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Vitest: 1.6.1 → 4.1.10 (3 behind)
Dependencies:
0 current 1 1-behind 2 2+ behind 1 unknown
 
Tech Stack
Frontend: React, React DOM
Meta-frameworks: Next.js
Bundlers: tsx, Turbo, Vite
CSS / UI: Autoprefixer, PostCSS, Tailwind CSS
Backend: Express
ORM / Database: Prisma, Prisma Client
Testing: Vitest
Lint & Format: ESLint, ESLint Prettier, ESLint React, Prettier, typescript-eslint
 
Services & Integrations
Auth: JWT 9.0.3
Databases: Prisma 5.22.0
 
TypeScript
v5.3.3 · strict ✔ · MIXED · target: ES2022
 
Build & Deploy
Package Managers: pnpm
Monorepo: npm-workspaces, pnpm-workspaces, turbo
 
Product Purpose Signals
Frameworks: react, nextjs
Evidence: 177
Top Signals:
- [heading] Dashboard (apps/admin/src/pages/Dashboard.tsx)
- [title] Revenue Overview (apps/admin/src/pages/Dashboard.tsx)
- [copy] workspace:* (packages/ui/package.json)
- [copy] ./dist (packages/ui/tsconfig.json)
- [copy] ./src/index.ts (packages/ui/package.json)
- [copy] @repo/config/tsconfig-base.json (packages/ui/tsconfig.json)
- [copy] @repo/ui (packages/ui/package.json)
- [copy] #3b82f6 (apps/admin/src/pages/Dashboard.tsx)
Unknowns:
- No pricing or billing evidence found.
- No integrations/connectors evidence found.
- No route structure evidence found.
 
Security Posture
Lockfile ✖ · .env ✔ · node_modules ✔
 
Platform
Native modules: turbo
 
Code Quality
Files: 36 · Functions: 183 · Avg complexity: 2.62 · Avg length: 21.13 lines
Max nesting: 2 · Circular deps: 0 · Dead code: 0%
God files: apps/admin/src/pages/Products (448 lines)
 
Database Schema
postgresql · 8 models · 1 enum
Models: Address, CartItem, Category, Order, OrderItem (+3 more)
 
Findings (16 errors, 11 warnings)
Node.js runtime ">=18.0.0" reached end-of-life on 2025-04-30 (latest: 24.0.0).
vibgrate/runtime-eol in .
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in .
60% of dependencies are 2+ major versions behind in node-turborepo.
vibgrate/dependency-rot in .
@types/node is 6 major versions behind (spec: ^20.11.0, latest: 26.1.2).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in .
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/admin
Vite is 3 major versions behind (current: 5.4.21, latest: 8.2.1).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/admin
vite is 3 major versions behind (spec: ^5.0.12, latest: 8.2.1).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in apps/admin
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/api
Vitest is 3 major versions behind (current: 1.6.1, latest: 4.1.10).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/api
@types/node is 6 major versions behind (spec: ^20.11.0, latest: 26.1.2).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in apps/api
vitest is 3 major versions behind (spec: ^1.2.1, latest: 4.1.10).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in apps/api
Next.js is 2 major versions behind (current: 14.2.35, latest: 16.3.0).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/web
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/web
@types/node is 6 major versions behind (spec: ^20.11.0, latest: 26.1.2).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in apps/web
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/config
56% of dependencies are 2+ major versions behind in @repo/config.
vibgrate/dependency-rot in packages/config
eslint-plugin-react-hooks is 3 major versions behind (spec: ^4.6.0, latest: 7.1.1).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in packages/config
Prisma is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.22.0, latest: 7.9.1).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/database
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/database
75% of dependencies are 2+ major versions behind in @repo/database.
vibgrate/dependency-rot in packages/database
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/types
100% of dependencies are 2+ major versions behind in @repo/types.
vibgrate/dependency-rot in packages/types
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/ui
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/utils
Vitest is 3 major versions behind (current: 1.6.1, latest: 4.1.10).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/utils
67% of dependencies are 2+ major versions behind in @repo/utils.
vibgrate/dependency-rot in packages/utils
vitest is 3 major versions behind (spec: ^1.2.1, latest: 4.1.10).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in packages/utils
 
╭──────────────────────────────────────────╮
Top Priority Actions
╰──────────────────────────────────────────╯
 
1. Upgrade EOL runtime in node-turborepo
End-of-life runtimes no longer receive security patches and block ecosystem upgrades.
./.
>=18.0.0 → 24.0.0 (6 majors behind)
Impact: −10 drift points (runtime & EOL)
 
2. Fix security posture: no lockfile found
Without a lockfile, installs are non-deterministic. Run the install command to generate one and commit it.
./
Missing: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, or yarn.lock
 
3. Upgrade Vite 5.4.21 → 8.2.1 in @repo/admin (+2 more)
3 major versions behind. Major framework drift increases breaking change risk and blocks access to security fixes and performance improvements.
./apps/admin
Vite: 5.4.21 → 8.2.1 (3 majors behind)
./apps/api
Vitest: 1.6.1 → 4.1.10 (3 majors behind)
./packages/utils
Vitest: 1.6.1 → 4.1.10 (3 majors behind)
Impact: −5–15 drift points
 
4. Reduce dependency rot in @repo/types (100% severely outdated)
1 of 1 dependencies are 2+ majors behind. Run `npm outdated` and prioritise packages with known CVEs or breaking API changes.
./packages/types
typescript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 majors behind)
Impact: −5–10 drift points
 
5. Reduce dependency rot in @repo/database (75% severely outdated)
3 of 4 dependencies are 2+ majors behind. Run `npm outdated` and prioritise packages with known CVEs or breaking API changes.
./packages/database
@prisma/client: 5.22.0 → 7.9.1 (2 majors behind)
prisma: 5.22.0 → 7.9.1 (2 majors behind)
typescript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 majors behind)
Impact: −5–10 drift points
 
╭──────────────────────────────────────────╮
Architecture Layers
╰──────────────────────────────────────────╯
 
Archetype: monorepo (80% confidence)
Files classified: 29 (6 unclassified)
 
presentation 9 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
routing 4 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
middleware 2 files drift ███████▍░░░░░░░░░░░░ 37 risk moderate
domain 4 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
data-access 2 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
infrastructure 0 files drift ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 0 risk none
config 3 files drift ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 0 risk none
shared 5 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
testing 0 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
 
╭──────────────────────────────────────────╮
DriftScore Summary
╰──────────────────────────────────────────╯
 
DriftScore: 66/100
Risk Level: HIGH
Projects: 9
Classified: 8 nano · 1 micro · 0 small · 0 standard
Billable: 0.42 · 9 detected → 0.42 billable projects (micro-project pricing)
0.1 micro · 0.32 nano
These fractions add up across repositories, then round down to whole billable projects.
 
Score Breakdown
Runtime: ████████████████████ 100
Frameworks: █████████▏░░░░░░░░░░ 46
Dependencies: ██████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 30
EOL Risk: ████████████████████ 100
 
Scanned at 2026-08-07T06:14:10.284Z · 25.2s · 286 files scanned · 56 workspace files · 27 dirs
Press Run to start.