Skip to main content

Programming Languages

Language specifications and standards

28
Standards
20
Products
3
FAQs
4
Benchmarks

Standards

ISO/IEC 14882:2023 (C++23)

Adhering to ISO/IEC standards during software migrations is crucial for ensuring quality, mitigating risks, and maintaining compliance. This comprehensive guide outlines the purpose of these standards, key compliance considerations, and actionable steps to facilitate successful migrations while addressing common challenges faced by teams.

by ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee

cpp-23

ISO/IEC 14882:2020 (C++20)

Unlock seamless data and code migration with ISO/IEC 14882:2020 (C++20). Explore migration standards for optimal cloud transformation today!

by ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee

cpp-20

ISO/IEC 14882:2017 (C++17)

Adhering to ISO/IEC standards during software migrations is essential for ensuring quality, compliance, and stakeholder confidence. This comprehensive guide provides practical insights on key requirements, implementation strategies, and tools to facilitate successful migrations while addressing common challenges organizations may face.

by ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee

cpp-17

ISO/IEC 14882:2014 (C++14)

Adhering to ISO/IEC standards is vital for successful software migrations, ensuring quality, security, and compliance. This guide provides practical insights on how to implement these standards effectively, addressing key requirements, tools, and common challenges faced by teams during the migration process.

by ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee

cpp-14

ISO/IEC 9899:2018 (C18)

Adhering to ISO/IEC standards during software migrations is crucial for minimizing risks, ensuring data integrity, and meeting compliance obligations. This guide outlines key requirements, practical steps for adherence, and tools that help maintain compliance, empowering teams to navigate their migration projects confidently and efficiently.

by ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee

c18

ISO/IEC 9899:2011 (C11)

ISO/IEC standards play a crucial role in ensuring quality and compliance during software migrations. By understanding these standards and implementing best practices, teams can mitigate risks, enhance stakeholder confidence, and navigate the complexities of migration projects effectively.

by ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee

c11

ECMA-262 2024 (ES2024)

Understanding and adhering to ECMA standards is essential for successful software migrations, ensuring interoperability, risk mitigation, and regulatory compliance. By following best practices, utilizing the right tools, and addressing common challenges, teams can navigate the complexities of migration projects with confidence and clarity.

by Ecma International

javascript-es2024

ECMA-262 2015 (ES6)

Adhering to ECMA standards during software migrations is crucial for ensuring interoperability, data integrity, and future-proofing systems. By understanding key requirements, utilizing appropriate tools, and addressing common challenges, teams can facilitate smoother transitions from legacy systems to modern platforms, ultimately reducing risks and enhancing collaboration.

by Ecma International

javascript-es6

ISO/IEC 30170:2022 (Ruby 3.1)

Adhering to ISO/IEC standards during software migrations is essential for ensuring quality, security, and compliance. This guide outlines the importance of these standards, key requirements for migration projects, and practical strategies for maintaining compliance, helping teams navigate their transitions with confidence and efficiency.

by ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee

ruby-3-1

ECMA-334 6th (C# 11)

Understanding the ECMAScript standard is critical for teams planning software migrations, as it ensures compatibility, reduces risks, and promotes efficient development practices. By following compliance guidelines and leveraging the right tools, teams can navigate the complexities of migration while maintaining code quality and performance.

by Ecma International

csharp-11

Java SE 17 (JSR 392)

Adhering to technical standards during software migrations is essential for ensuring data integrity, security, and stakeholder confidence. This comprehensive guide outlines the purpose of these standards, key compliance considerations, and practical steps to maintain adherence throughout the migration process, ultimately facilitating a smoother transition to modern platforms.

by Oracle

java-se-17

Java SE 8 (JSR 337)

Adhering to Oracle migration standards is crucial for ensuring data integrity, system compatibility, and regulatory compliance during software migrations. By implementing a structured approach and utilizing the right tools, teams can navigate common challenges and achieve successful transitions to modern Oracle solutions.

by Oracle

java-se-8

Python 3.12 (PEP 693)

Understanding and adhering to Python standards during software migrations is crucial for ensuring code clarity, compatibility, and maintainability. By following key guidelines such as PEP 8 compliance, implementing comprehensive testing, and utilizing effective tools, teams can mitigate risks and foster collaboration, ultimately ensuring a successful migration process.

by Python Software Foundation

python-3-12

Python PEP 8 (Style Guide)

Understanding migration standards in Python is crucial for ensuring seamless transitions from legacy systems. By adhering to these standards, teams can mitigate risks, maintain security, and enhance performance during migrations. Practical steps and tools can further support compliance, leading to successful project outcomes.

by Python Software Foundation

pep-8

Go 1.22 Spec

Compliance standards are essential for successful software migrations, helping organizations protect sensitive data, maintain system integrity, and adhere to legal requirements. By following best practices and using appropriate tools, teams can ensure their migration projects meet compliance standards, mitigating risks and fostering stakeholder trust.

by Google

go-1-22

Rust 1.78 Edition 2024

Migrating systems that utilize Rust requires adherence to its safety and performance standards. By leveraging Rust's ownership model, error handling capabilities, and robust tooling, teams can ensure a successful transition while mitigating common challenges. Following these guidelines will lead to safer, more reliable applications post-migration.

by Rust Foundation

rust-2024

Swift 5.9 Language Guide

Understanding Apple's migration standards is crucial for teams planning software migrations. These standards ensure data integrity, user privacy, and security, helping organizations execute migrations effectively while minimizing risks. By following key requirements and leveraging the right tools, teams can maintain compliance and address common challenges throughout the migration process.

by Apple

swift-5-9

Kotlin 2.0 Spec

Understanding and adhering to established migration standards is crucial for successful software transitions. These standards help mitigate risks, ensure data integrity, and maintain compliance, leading to a smoother migration process. By leveraging the right tools and processes, teams can address common challenges and execute migrations with confidence.

by JetBrains

kotlin-2-0

PHP 8.3 Spec

Adhering to PHP standards during software migrations is vital for ensuring code quality, consistency, and maintainability. By following established guidelines, utilizing appropriate tools, and addressing challenges proactively, teams can achieve successful migrations that integrate legacy systems into modern frameworks effectively.

by PHP Foundation

php-8-3

Perl 5.38 Syntax

Adhering to Perl standards during software migrations is crucial for ensuring code compatibility, maintaining best practices, and streamlining the transition process. By conducting thorough code audits, implementing robust testing protocols, and utilizing effective tools, teams can navigate the complexities of migration with confidence and achieve successful outcomes.

by Perl Foundation

perl-5-38

TypeScript 5.4 Spec

Adhering to Microsoft standards during software migrations is essential for ensuring security, performance, and regulatory compliance. By understanding these standards and implementing best practices, teams can navigate migration complexities effectively, minimizing risks and maximizing efficiency.

by Microsoft

typescript-5-4

Scala 3.4 Reference

EPFL standards are essential for ensuring quality and compliance in software migrations. By following these guidelines, teams can enhance reliability, streamline processes, and maintain compliance, significantly reducing the risks associated with transitioning from legacy systems to modern platforms.

by EPFL

scala-3-4

Erlang/OTP 26

Understanding and adhering to Ericsson's technical standards is essential for successful software migrations. These standards provide a framework for ensuring data protection, interoperability, and performance, thereby mitigating risks and enhancing efficiency. By following best practices and leveraging appropriate tools, teams can navigate the complexities of migration while maintaining compliance with industry standards.

by Ericsson

erlang-26

Elixir 1.17

Ericsson's migration standards provide a comprehensive framework for ensuring smooth and secure software transitions. By adhering to these guidelines, teams can mitigate risks, enhance efficiency, and maintain stakeholder trust throughout the migration process.

by Ericsson

elixir-1-17

Haskell 2010 Report

Understanding Haskell standards is crucial for teams migrating Haskell-based applications. By adhering to Haskell's principles of type safety, functional purity, and modularity, developers can ensure more reliable and maintainable migrations. This guide provides actionable insights and tools to navigate the complexities of Haskell migrations effectively.

by Haskell Foundation

haskell-2010

ISO/IEC 23270:2006 (C# 2.0)

Understanding ISO/IEC standards is essential for successful software migrations, as they provide a framework for quality assurance, data security, and interoperability. By adhering to these standards, organizations can mitigate risks, enhance trust, and improve operational efficiency during migration projects. This guide outlines key requirements, compliance considerations, and practical tools to ensure your migrations align with recognized standards.

by ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee

csharp-2-0

OCaml 5.2 Spec

Understanding and adhering to technical standards during software migrations is essential for minimizing risks, enhancing efficiency, and building stakeholder confidence. By following established guidelines and employing the right tools, teams can ensure data integrity, security compliance, and successful interoperability throughout the migration process.

by INRIA

ocaml-5-2

ISO/IEC 13211-1:1995 (Prolog)

Understanding the ISO/IEC standard is essential for successful software migrations, ensuring data integrity, security, and compliance. This framework provides essential guidelines that help organizations manage risks, enhance operational efficiency, and foster stakeholder trust, making it a key component of any migration strategy.

by ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee

prolog-1995

Products & Technologies

Java

High-level, class-based, object-oriented programming language

Python

High-level, interpreted programming language with dynamic semantics

JavaScript

High-level, dynamic programming language for web development

TypeScript

Strongly typed programming language that builds on JavaScript

Go

Statically typed, compiled programming language designed at Google

Rust

Systems programming language focused on safety, speed, and concurrency

C#

Modern, object-oriented programming language developed by Microsoft

Kotlin

Modern, concise programming language for JVM, Android, and multiplatform

Swift

Powerful and intuitive programming language for Apple platforms

Ruby

Dynamic, open source programming language with focus on simplicity

PHP

Popular general-purpose scripting language suited for web development

Scala

Functional and object-oriented programming language for JVM

Elixir

Functional programming language running on Erlang VM

Clojure

Dynamic, functional programming language for JVM

Haskell

Purely functional programming language with strong static typing

C++

General-purpose programming language with object-oriented features

C

General-purpose programming language for system programming

Dart

Client-optimized language for fast apps on any platform

R

Programming language for statistical computing and graphics

Julia

High-level, high-performance programming language for technical computing

Patterns

Factory Method

Defines an interface for creating an object but lets subclasses decide which concrete class to instantiate, deferring instantiation to subclasses.

Abstract Factory

Provides an interface for creating families of related objects without specifying their concrete classes, ensuring products from one family are used together.

Builder

Separates the construction of a complex object from its representation so the same construction process can create different representations step by step.

Prototype

Creates new objects by cloning an existing instance (the prototype) rather than instantiating a class, useful when construction is costly or types are decided at runtime.

Singleton

Ensures a class has only one instance and provides a global point of access to it, used for shared resources like configuration, logging, or connection pools.

Lazy Initialization

Defers the creation or computation of an object until the first time it is actually needed, avoiding upfront cost for resources that may never be used.

Multiton

Generalizes Singleton to manage a fixed, keyed set of named instances, ensuring exactly one instance exists per key through a registry.

Registry

Provides a well-known central object where shared instances or services can be registered and looked up by key, giving a single point of access without scattered globals.

Adapter

Converts the interface of a class into another interface clients expect, letting classes that could not otherwise collaborate work together.

Bridge

Decouples an abstraction from its implementation so the two can vary independently, avoiding a combinatorial explosion of subclasses.

Composite

Composes objects into tree structures to represent part-whole hierarchies, letting clients treat individual objects and compositions uniformly.

Decorator

Attaches additional responsibilities to an object dynamically by wrapping it, providing a flexible alternative to subclassing for extending behavior.

Flyweight

Minimizes memory use by sharing as much data as possible between many similar objects, separating intrinsic shared state from extrinsic context-specific state.

Proxy

Provides a surrogate or placeholder for another object to control access to it, enabling lazy loading, access control, caching, or remote access.

Module

Encapsulates related code into a single self-contained unit with a controlled public interface and hidden private state, organizing code and avoiding global namespace pollution.

Marker Interface

Uses an empty interface to tag a class with metadata so other code can detect the capability at runtime via type checks, without adding any methods.

Mixin

Composes reusable units of behavior into a class without inheritance, letting unrelated classes share functionality by mixing in shared method sets.

Extension Object

Lets you add new interfaces and behavior to a class over time without changing it, by attaching extension objects that clients query for at runtime.

Private Class Data

Restricts accessor-write access to class attributes by isolating data in a separate object exposed read-only after construction, enforcing immutability and encapsulation.

Producer-Consumer

A concurrency pattern where producers place work on a shared bounded queue and consumers process it independently, decoupling rates and smoothing load.

Thread Pool

A concurrency pattern that reuses a fixed set of worker threads to execute many tasks, avoiding per-task thread creation cost and bounding concurrency.

Actor Model

A concurrency model where independent actors encapsulate state and communicate only by asynchronous messages, avoiding shared memory and locks.

Reactor

An event-handling pattern that demultiplexes I/O events on one or few threads and dispatches them synchronously to registered handlers, enabling scalable non-blocking servers.

Tutorials

Migrating JavaScript to TypeScript

Gradually migrate a JavaScript codebase to TypeScript

Runtime Validation with Zod

Add runtime type validation to TypeScript using Zod

How to set up a Go project with modules and tests

Start a Go project with Go modules, structure packages, and write table-driven tests using the standard testing package.

How to set up a Rust project with Cargo and tests

Create a Rust project with Cargo, add dependencies from crates.io, and write unit and integration tests.

How to set up a Python project with Poetry and pytest

Create a reproducible Python project using Poetry for dependency management and pytest for testing.

How to set up a Java project with Maven and JUnit

Create a Java project with Maven, manage dependencies, and write unit tests with JUnit 5.

How to set up a .NET project with xUnit tests

Create a .NET solution with a class library and an xUnit test project using the dotnet CLI.

How to set up a Node and TypeScript project with Vitest

Create a TypeScript project on Node.js, configure the compiler, and write fast unit tests with Vitest.

How to set up a Kotlin project with Gradle and JUnit

Create a Kotlin project with the Gradle build tool, manage dependencies, and write tests with JUnit 5.

How to use concurrency in Go with goroutines and channels

Run concurrent work in Go using goroutines, coordinate with channels, and synchronize with WaitGroup and context.

How to write concurrent Rust with threads and channels

Use Rust's threads, channels, and shared-state primitives to write concurrent code that the compiler proves is data-race free.

How to write concurrent Python with asyncio

Use Python's asyncio to run I/O-bound work concurrently with coroutines, tasks, and gather, and know when to use threads instead.

How to use concurrency in Java with executors and virtual threads

Run concurrent tasks in Java using the ExecutorService, futures, and lightweight virtual threads for scalable I/O.

How to write asynchronous C# with async and await

Use C# async and await with Task to run I/O-bound work concurrently, avoid blocking, and handle cancellation.

Checklists

Java Framework Upgrade Pre-Flight Checklist

Pre-flight checks for upgrading a Java application's runtime and framework, such as Java 8 to 17 or Spring Boot 2 to 3.

.NET Framework to .NET Upgrade Checklist

Plan a migration from .NET Framework to modern .NET, covering API gaps, project format, dependencies, and hosting changes.

Python 2 to 3 Migration Checklist

Step-by-step checks for migrating a legacy Python 2 codebase to Python 3, covering syntax, encoding, and dependency changes.

Ruby on Rails Upgrade Pre-Flight Checklist

Pre-flight checks for upgrading a Ruby on Rails application across major versions, such as Rails 6 to 7.

PHP Version Upgrade Checklist

Checks for upgrading a PHP application across major versions, such as PHP 7 to 8, including framework and extension compatibility.

TypeScript Adoption Readiness Checklist

Verify tooling, configuration, and an incremental strategy are in place before adopting TypeScript in a JavaScript codebase.

FAQs

What is the difference between compiled and interpreted languages?

A compiled language is translated ahead of time into machine code by a compiler, producing a standalone executable that the CPU runs directly—languages like C, Go, and Rust work this way and tend to run fast. An interpreted language is executed line by line at runtime by an interpreter, as with classic Python or Ruby, which trades some speed for flexibility and faster iteration. The line is blurry: many modern languages, such as Java and C#, compile to bytecode that a virtual machine then interprets or just-in-time compiles. The distinction is really about implementation, not the language itself.

What is type safety?

Type safety is the degree to which a programming language prevents type errors—operations applied to values of the wrong type, like adding a number to a function. Statically typed languages such as Java, Go, and TypeScript check types at compile time, catching many mistakes before the code runs. Dynamically typed languages such as Python and JavaScript check types at runtime, offering more flexibility but deferring errors until execution. Stronger type safety generally improves reliability and tooling support at the cost of some upfront strictness.

What is the difference between imperative and declarative programming?

Imperative programming describes how to achieve a result through explicit step-by-step instructions that change program state, as in a typical for-loop that mutates a counter. Declarative programming describes what result you want and lets the system figure out how, as in SQL queries, HTML, or functional operations like map and filter. Declarative code is often more concise and easier to reason about, while imperative code gives finer control over execution. Many languages and tools blend both styles depending on the problem.

Benchmarks

SPECjvm 2008

Benchmark suite measuring core Java Virtual Machine performance across compute-intensive workloads independent of application or hardware tuning.

Computer Language Benchmarks Game

Long-running comparison of programming-language implementations on small algorithmic tasks, measuring runtime, memory, and code size.

Renaissance JVM Benchmark Suite

Modern JVM benchmark suite using real-world concurrent and parallel workloads to stress runtime optimization, GC, and JIT compilers.

DaCapo JVM Benchmark Suite

Long-established Java benchmark suite using real open-source application workloads to evaluate JVM, JIT, and garbage-collection performance.

Vibgrate CLI

See a real scan run

A replay of the actual CLI running against our test repositories — live progress, real findings, a genuine DriftScore. Nothing executes in your browser.

Replay
demo@vibgrate — bash
npx @vibgrate/cli scan
 
╭──────────────────────────────────────────╮
Vibgrate Drift Report
╰──────────────────────────────────────────╯
 
── node-turborepo (node) .
Runtime: >=18.0.0 (6 majors behind)
Frameworks:
Turbo: 1.13.4 → 2.10.8 (1 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Dependencies:
1 current 1 1-behind 3 2+ behind 1 unknown
 
── @repo/admin (node) apps/admin
Frameworks:
TanStack Query: 5.101.4 → 5.101.4 (current)
React: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
React DOM: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Vite: 5.4.21 → 8.2.1 (3 behind)
Dependencies:
3 current 9 1-behind 3 2+ behind 4 unknown
 
── @repo/api (node) apps/api
Frameworks:
Express: 4.22.2 → 5.2.1 (1 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Vitest: 1.6.1 → 4.1.10 (3 behind)
Dependencies:
7 current 5 1-behind 3 2+ behind 4 unknown
 
── @repo/web (node) apps/web
Frameworks:
Next.js: 14.2.35 → 16.3.0 (2 behind)
React: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
React DOM: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Dependencies:
2 current 6 1-behind 3 2+ behind 5 unknown
 
── @repo/config (node) packages/config
Frameworks:
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Dependencies:
2 current 2 1-behind 5 2+ behind 0 unknown
 
── @repo/database (node) packages/database
Frameworks:
Prisma: 5.22.0 → 7.9.1 (2 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Dependencies:
1 current 0 1-behind 3 2+ behind 1 unknown
 
── @repo/types (node) packages/types
Frameworks:
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Dependencies:
0 current 0 1-behind 1 2+ behind 1 unknown
 
── @repo/ui (node) packages/ui
Frameworks:
React: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
React: 18.3.1 → 19.2.8 (1 behind)
Dependencies:
1 current 4 1-behind 1 2+ behind 1 unknown
 
── @repo/utils (node) packages/utils
Frameworks:
TypeScript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 behind)
Vitest: 1.6.1 → 4.1.10 (3 behind)
Dependencies:
0 current 1 1-behind 2 2+ behind 1 unknown
 
Tech Stack
Frontend: React, React DOM
Meta-frameworks: Next.js
Bundlers: tsx, Turbo, Vite
CSS / UI: Autoprefixer, PostCSS, Tailwind CSS
Backend: Express
ORM / Database: Prisma, Prisma Client
Testing: Vitest
Lint & Format: ESLint, ESLint Prettier, ESLint React, Prettier, typescript-eslint
 
Services & Integrations
Auth: JWT 9.0.3
Databases: Prisma 5.22.0
 
TypeScript
v5.3.3 · strict ✔ · MIXED · target: ES2022
 
Build & Deploy
Package Managers: pnpm
Monorepo: npm-workspaces, pnpm-workspaces, turbo
 
Product Purpose Signals
Frameworks: react, nextjs
Evidence: 177
Top Signals:
- [heading] Dashboard (apps/admin/src/pages/Dashboard.tsx)
- [title] Revenue Overview (apps/admin/src/pages/Dashboard.tsx)
- [copy] workspace:* (packages/ui/package.json)
- [copy] ./dist (packages/ui/tsconfig.json)
- [copy] ./src/index.ts (packages/ui/package.json)
- [copy] @repo/config/tsconfig-base.json (packages/ui/tsconfig.json)
- [copy] @repo/ui (packages/ui/package.json)
- [copy] #3b82f6 (apps/admin/src/pages/Dashboard.tsx)
Unknowns:
- No pricing or billing evidence found.
- No integrations/connectors evidence found.
- No route structure evidence found.
 
Security Posture
Lockfile ✖ · .env ✔ · node_modules ✔
 
Platform
Native modules: turbo
 
Code Quality
Files: 36 · Functions: 183 · Avg complexity: 2.62 · Avg length: 21.13 lines
Max nesting: 2 · Circular deps: 0 · Dead code: 0%
God files: apps/admin/src/pages/Products (448 lines)
 
Database Schema
postgresql · 8 models · 1 enum
Models: Address, CartItem, Category, Order, OrderItem (+3 more)
 
Findings (16 errors, 11 warnings)
Node.js runtime ">=18.0.0" reached end-of-life on 2025-04-30 (latest: 24.0.0).
vibgrate/runtime-eol in .
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in .
60% of dependencies are 2+ major versions behind in node-turborepo.
vibgrate/dependency-rot in .
@types/node is 6 major versions behind (spec: ^20.11.0, latest: 26.1.2).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in .
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/admin
Vite is 3 major versions behind (current: 5.4.21, latest: 8.2.1).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/admin
vite is 3 major versions behind (spec: ^5.0.12, latest: 8.2.1).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in apps/admin
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/api
Vitest is 3 major versions behind (current: 1.6.1, latest: 4.1.10).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/api
@types/node is 6 major versions behind (spec: ^20.11.0, latest: 26.1.2).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in apps/api
vitest is 3 major versions behind (spec: ^1.2.1, latest: 4.1.10).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in apps/api
Next.js is 2 major versions behind (current: 14.2.35, latest: 16.3.0).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/web
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in apps/web
@types/node is 6 major versions behind (spec: ^20.11.0, latest: 26.1.2).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in apps/web
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/config
56% of dependencies are 2+ major versions behind in @repo/config.
vibgrate/dependency-rot in packages/config
eslint-plugin-react-hooks is 3 major versions behind (spec: ^4.6.0, latest: 7.1.1).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in packages/config
Prisma is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.22.0, latest: 7.9.1).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/database
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/database
75% of dependencies are 2+ major versions behind in @repo/database.
vibgrate/dependency-rot in packages/database
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/types
100% of dependencies are 2+ major versions behind in @repo/types.
vibgrate/dependency-rot in packages/types
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/ui
TypeScript is 2 major versions behind (current: 5.9.3, latest: 7.0.2).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/utils
Vitest is 3 major versions behind (current: 1.6.1, latest: 4.1.10).
vibgrate/framework-major-lag in packages/utils
67% of dependencies are 2+ major versions behind in @repo/utils.
vibgrate/dependency-rot in packages/utils
vitest is 3 major versions behind (spec: ^1.2.1, latest: 4.1.10).
vibgrate/dependency-major-lag in packages/utils
 
╭──────────────────────────────────────────╮
Top Priority Actions
╰──────────────────────────────────────────╯
 
1. Upgrade EOL runtime in node-turborepo
End-of-life runtimes no longer receive security patches and block ecosystem upgrades.
./.
>=18.0.0 → 24.0.0 (6 majors behind)
Impact: −10 drift points (runtime & EOL)
 
2. Fix security posture: no lockfile found
Without a lockfile, installs are non-deterministic. Run the install command to generate one and commit it.
./
Missing: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, or yarn.lock
 
3. Upgrade Vite 5.4.21 → 8.2.1 in @repo/admin (+2 more)
3 major versions behind. Major framework drift increases breaking change risk and blocks access to security fixes and performance improvements.
./apps/admin
Vite: 5.4.21 → 8.2.1 (3 majors behind)
./apps/api
Vitest: 1.6.1 → 4.1.10 (3 majors behind)
./packages/utils
Vitest: 1.6.1 → 4.1.10 (3 majors behind)
Impact: −5–15 drift points
 
4. Reduce dependency rot in @repo/types (100% severely outdated)
1 of 1 dependencies are 2+ majors behind. Run `npm outdated` and prioritise packages with known CVEs or breaking API changes.
./packages/types
typescript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 majors behind)
Impact: −5–10 drift points
 
5. Reduce dependency rot in @repo/database (75% severely outdated)
3 of 4 dependencies are 2+ majors behind. Run `npm outdated` and prioritise packages with known CVEs or breaking API changes.
./packages/database
@prisma/client: 5.22.0 → 7.9.1 (2 majors behind)
prisma: 5.22.0 → 7.9.1 (2 majors behind)
typescript: 5.9.3 → 7.0.2 (2 majors behind)
Impact: −5–10 drift points
 
╭──────────────────────────────────────────╮
Architecture Layers
╰──────────────────────────────────────────╯
 
Archetype: monorepo (80% confidence)
Files classified: 29 (6 unclassified)
 
presentation 9 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
routing 4 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
middleware 2 files drift ███████▍░░░░░░░░░░░░ 37 risk moderate
domain 4 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
data-access 2 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
infrastructure 0 files drift ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 0 risk none
config 3 files drift ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 0 risk none
shared 5 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
testing 0 files drift ████████████████████ 100 risk high
 
╭──────────────────────────────────────────╮
DriftScore Summary
╰──────────────────────────────────────────╯
 
DriftScore: 66/100
Risk Level: HIGH
Projects: 9
Classified: 8 nano · 1 micro · 0 small · 0 standard
Billable: 0.42 · 9 detected → 0.42 billable projects (micro-project pricing)
0.1 micro · 0.32 nano
These fractions add up across repositories, then round down to whole billable projects.
 
Score Breakdown
Runtime: ████████████████████ 100
Frameworks: █████████▏░░░░░░░░░░ 46
Dependencies: ██████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 30
EOL Risk: ████████████████████ 100
 
Scanned at 2026-08-07T06:14:10.284Z · 25.2s · 286 files scanned · 56 workspace files · 27 dirs
Press Run to start.