NoSQL Data Modeling Review Checklist
A review checklist for NoSQL data models, validating them against access patterns, partition-key choice, and scalability before migration. It targets the access-pattern-first mindset that relational habits miss. Use it before committing to a key-value or document model like DynamoDB or Cassandra.
When to Use This Checklist
Use this checklist to review a NoSQL data model before committing to it, especially when migrating from a relational database to a key-value or document store like DynamoDB or Cassandra. NoSQL modeling inverts relational habits: you design around access patterns and partitioning, not normalized entities. A model that ignores this delivers poor performance and runaway cost at scale.
How to Use This Checklist
Start by enumerating every read and write access pattern, because the model must serve them directly. Choose a partition key that spreads load evenly and avoids hot partitions, then verify the primary patterns run without expensive scans. Decide embedding versus referencing, and plan how denormalized duplicates stay consistent when data changes. Load-test with realistic data before you commit. The required items prevent the failure modes that only appear at scale.
What Good Looks Like
A sound NoSQL model is driven by documented access patterns, with a partition key that distributes load and no hot spots. Primary queries are served directly without table scans, embedding and referencing decisions are deliberate, and the plan for keeping denormalized copies consistent is explicit. Item-size limits and consistency requirements are addressed per operation. The model is load-tested with realistic data and query mix, and its throughput and cost are estimated before launch.
Common Pitfalls
The defining mistake is modeling NoSQL like a relational schema, then bolting on scans and secondary indexes to compensate, which is slow and expensive. A poorly chosen partition key creates hot partitions that throttle the whole table. Teams forget that denormalized duplicates must be kept in sync, leading to inconsistent reads. Ignoring item-size limits causes runtime failures. Finally, skipping load testing hides cost and performance problems until production traffic arrives.
Related Resources
Apply domain-driven-design-ddd to understand the entities, and consider cqrs-command-query-responsibility-segregation when read and write models diverge. Plan item changes with schema-evolution-schema-registry and verify integrity with data-quality-management.